About four years ago, a nonarchaeologist manager in my company asked me if it is against the law to collect American Indian artifacts while strolling along the edge of a Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) lake with his little boy. This manager was not an artifact collector, and his sole thought was to find and keep an arrowhead or some other ancient artifact that could be the focus of a new learning experience for both him and his child. Yesterday, some unknown person did a search of the Archaeology in Tennessee blog, and their search question (slightly edited) was: “Is it against the law to hunt for Indian artifacts in Tennessee?” This question comes up relatively often here in Tennessee, so I thought this would be as good a time as any to offer some quick answers to this question for those who are interested.
The four verbs and verb terms one hears most often in such questions from ordinary Tennessee citizens are collect, hunt for, look for, or pick up an artifact. All four do not precisely state their real question. This question, perhaps better stated, is as follows:
Within the state boundaries of Tennessee, is it legal for me to see an artifact lying on the surface of the ground or in a hole I just dug, reach down and grab it with my hand, stuff it in my pocket or sack, and take it home with me to be my private property for the rest of my life?
Herein I shall use the single verb collect to capture all that is in the above question. Because it is so late this night, I feel like offering my answers in a listing format, so please pay close attention to the following list:
(1) It is against federal law to collect any ancient American Indian artifact, historic-era American Indian artifact, or any other historic-era artifact on the federal lands and in the federal waters of Tennessee. This applies to any artifact found lying on the ground surface or any artifact found while digging a hole, scratching around on a river bank, scratching around on the shore of a lake, diving in water, or metal detecting on federal lands or in federal waters.
At this juncture, ordinary folks usually ask the following question:
Do you mean to tell me that if my 3-year-old son picks up just one arrowhead at a TVA lake access, stuffs it in the pocket of his Osh-Kosh-B-Gosh overalls, and takes it home, he has committed a federal crime?
The short answer: Yes. The existing federal laws and regulations do not contain any special exemptions or accommodations for a toddler who pockets just one artifact, for a tourist who does the same, or for the Little Old Lady from Pasadena. The only people allowed to collect artifacts on the federal lands and in the federal waters of Tennessee are persons who have received a written federal permit to do professional archaeological research. If you are not a professional archaeologist, your chances of getting such a permit are about the same as being struck by a lightning bolt originating on the planet Venus.
Some federal agencies even turn down research permit requests made by professional archaeologists. Other federal agencies refuse to answer even the simplest professional archaeologist requests for archaeological information and data. It kind of makes one wonder for what purpose their cultural resources are being preserved—and in which future century or millennium their squirreled away information and data might actually be used for something worthwhile. Why even call such information and data a cultural resource if no American archaeologist is ever going to be allowed to see it or use it? Yes, I know all of the standard arguments about site preservation, future archaeological technologies, and so forth. I agree with all of that like you do, but I am not talking about archaeological research that involves destructive new excavation of archaeological sites on federal lands—far from it.
I am talking about federal agencies who prevent professional archaeologists access to existing archaeological information and data already on-hand in paper and electronic files, information that could be highly useful in archaeological research right now without physically destroying anything. Some of these federal agencies will not even share this information and data with professional archaeologists in other federal agencies. If professional archaeologists cannot be trusted to appropriately and protectively handle/use this information and data, who can be? Are these federal bureaucrats preserving information and data so they can watch it decay in situ within a file cabinet or on a hard drive for hundreds or even thousands of years? Does that sound sane to you? If you are a Tennessee citizen or a citizen of another state and this outlandish federal agency dysfunction makes you as upset as it does me, please write a letter to President Trump, your two U.S. Senators, and your U.S. Congressman. Ask them to pass federal legislation that will put an end to this nonsensical withholding of already existing archaeological information and data from professional archaeologists. Withholding valuable archaeological information and data “just because I can” is not a viable or defensible use of federal tax dollars.
(2) It is against Tennessee state law to collect any ancient American Indian artifact, historic-era American Indian artifact, or any other historic-era artifact on state-owned land, state-controlled land, or in state waters. This includes any artifact found by surface collecting or digging. The only people allowed to collect artifacts on Tennessee lands and in Tennessee waters are professional archaeologists who have received a written state permit to do archaeological research on state property. If you are not a professional archaeologist, your chances of receiving such a permit are about the same as incurring a Martian nerve gas attack while on tour in the Republica Inhambane, an extinct Portuguese colonial city-state in Africa that once issued its own postage stamps.
(3) It is against Tennessee state law to collect any ancient American Indian artifact, historic-era American Indian artifact, or any other historic-era artifact on county, city, or municipal lands (or in any waters they own or control) without permission from the appropriate county, town, or municipal agency. This includes any artifact found by surface collecting or digging. Some Tennessee local governments may have ordinances or formal procedures that must be followed to obtain such permission. If you are not a professional archaeologist, your chances of getting permission to collect artifacts on their lands and in their waters are about the same as those for winning the jackpot in the Planetoid Pluto Lottery.
(4) It is against Tennessee state law to collect any ancient American Indian artifact, historic-era American Indian artifact, or any other historic-era artifact on privately owned land in Tennessee without permission from the owner of the property. This includes surface collecting for artifacts, digging for artifacts, and metal detecting for artifacts. If such permission is ever sought, it is best to get that permission in writing with the property owner’s signature. Why is that? Orally given permission is just your oral word against the property owner’s oral word—often with no third party witnesses. If some misunderstanding develops later between the property owner and a collector, and it goes to court, you will have no documentary evidence that you had permission to be on the property. You can be convicted of both trespassing and failing to get permission to collect artifacts on the owner’s property. Two other warnings need to be added here, and they need to be taken very seriously:
(A) Tennessee state law is highly specific about getting permission to collect from the property owner—not the guy who is renting the property from the owner and not some kid playing in the front yard or a granny sitting in her rocker on the front porch of a house on the property. You have to get permission from the legal property owner. A person also needs to consider the problem of mutual and divided ownership of property. For example, two brothers may jointly own a piece of property—and you would need to get written permission from both.
In some parts of Tennessee, particularly on the Cumberland Plateau, many large tracts of land involve divided rights. For example, a homeowner may own the small tract of farmland his house is built on, but a large timber and mining company may own the mineral rights and timber rights to that same small tract of land and all of the land surrounding it. What do you do about permission in that complicated case? Beats me!!! Consult with an attorney.
Another issue is knowing where the property lines are. Even if you have written permission to collect from a property owner, if you accidentally stray outside their property lines and collect artifacts there, you can be arrested for collecting without permission on the next door neighbor’s private property.
(B) Digging for artifacts on private property with the property owner’s permission is legal in Tennessee. However, it is not a good idea for two very good reasons:
(a) Digging without a grid system and three-dimensional spatial control (using surveying instruments) destroys the unique story of the past written in the soil on an archaeological site. Sure. You may get a great artifact out of it, but no one else will ever be able to read the rest of the ancient story written in the square meter of soil surrounding that artifact. Why? You churned and disturbed the soil with your shovel, handpick, or grapefruit knife. What is that like, and how does it erase? It is like having a stranger cut an 8-inch circle out of the center of a page in your daughter’s high school history textbook, and your daughter has a big test covering that page tomorrow in class. Because that portion of the page is missing, your daughter flunks the test and gets chewed out by her teacher because she could not study that page in her textbook. It had a big hole in the middle of the page. You see? It is not all about you and an ancient object you want out of the ground. Your behavior can and does hurt other people and the story of the past written in the soil—and it hurts it forever. The story in the soil that you erased with your digging is gone forever—and it can never be read by any person in the future.
(b) Digging for artifacts, even with written property owner permission, can still land you in prison—with a misdemeanor charge or even with a Class E felony charge—if you encounter a human burial during your digging or you are digging in a stone box burial, a mound, or any other material culture structure or landform that could be legally construed as being a cemetery monument.
Even if encountering buried human remains or a burial monument (like a stone box grave) was just an unexpected accident, the authorities are likely to operate on the legal presumption that you were intentionally disturbing the buried human remains and/or defacing the monument to find and take home any artifacts associated with them. Sure. You could claim it was just an accident—and maybe it really was just that—an accident. But hey, you collect artifacts—and to the investigating policeman—the optics of the situation look bad in the field—really bad—and the policeman is going to report what he observes in a written report—and the courts will consider those reported optics in their deliberations—and it can go really badly for you.
Therefore, our best advice with regard to digging for artifacts—even with written property owner permission—is plain and simple. Be considerate of the ancient story written in the soil and protect yourself from legal trouble by avoiding digging entirely. Just do not do it. Future generations will thank you for it, and you will have made a wonderful contribution to Tennessee archaeology in an age when archaeological sites are quickly disappearing as a result of illicit digging and property development.
(5) Finally—just for fun—some professional archaeologists in Tennessee have told me that private property owners refuse them permission to do archaeological research on their lands more often than they grant them permission to do so. Up until last summer, I had never encountered that problem.
The best way for a professional archaeologist to get land owner permission is to approach them in the same manner as that well-known master of social interaction and chivalry: Sir Budlowe Brown. Below is a photograph of our Pembroke Welsh Corgi (Sir Budlowe Brown) striking the correct pose for requesting permission to perform professional archaeological research on privately owned land in Tennessee. Who could turn down that face? The property owner may ask for your dog’s autograph in exchange for his permission. Be sure to carry an ink pad and paper with you for this purpose.
Unfortunately, when I got my first field research turn-down in a most unexpectedly angry, vicious, and truly puzzling manner by one private property owner last summer, I did not have Buddy Brown with me. But yes. You are right. This whole section was just a clever excuse to introduce you to the cute little canine that spreads his shed fur across our house floors like a second layer of carpet; claims Buckingham Palace is his true home; and constantly sounds a warning: “THE FAMINE BEGINS TOMORROW—AND I NEED FOOD NOW!!! Truthfully, unlike our last Welsh Corgi, who was a highly intelligent and thoroughly obedient English gentleman who worked at the local hospital as a Certified Therapy Dog, Buddy Brown is damned near worthless. Despite regular exercise, lots of gentle love, high-quality food, formal obedience training, and free run of the house, sleeping and loafing are his two major activities. He is willful, stiff necked, disobedient, and absolutely convinced that he is the Alpha Dog over all of both “Dogdom” and “Peopledom.” He cleverly steals food from our plates when we are not looking, and he implements strategic ruses to draw our attention to elsewhere spots in our house so he can sneak behind our backs into rooms with wastebaskets that contain food items. We have thought about “taking him back to Carthage where he was born” numerous times over the past 10 years. But just like the white horse in the movie Sea Biscuit, we keep him around because “he is still good to look at.”
How ’bout it?