The Jimmy Carter Clause in ARPA – Part IV: The “Less than 100 Years Old” Argument

We here at the Archaeology in Tennessee blog do not claim to be licensed attorneys, and the text of this blog post should not be taken or construed as legal counsel. If you need such counsel, please contact a licensed attorney in your state or U.S. territory.  With that said, the owner of this blog has spent a great deal of the past 26 years working on federal contract projects that involved compliance with the many federal statutes and regulations applicable to protection of the environment in the United States. More than five of those years were spent as the lead Environmental Compliance Specialist for Battelle Memorial Institute (Oak Ridge), a federal prime contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy. Collectively, the texts of these environmental statutes and regulations are voluminous, complex, and highly detailed―much more so than the current federal cultural resource management statutes and regulations. Multiple volumes of these environmental laws and regulations easily fill several shelves in a bookcase. Over the years, our blog owner has found that certain general principles and interpretive rules of thumb apply to the content of virtually all federal statutes and regulations, regardless of the subject matter that they address. Therefore, with his input, the blog feels reasonably qualified to offer some thoughts on the Jimmy Carter Clause and the confusion surrounding it within the artifact collector community.  This post is provided as a public service of the Oak Ridge Archaeological Research Institute.

This one is going to be short and to the point.  Section 3 of the Archaeological Resources Protection Act of 1979 (ARPA) states the following:

(1) The term “archaeological resource” means any material remains of past human life or activities which are of archaeological interest, as determined under the uniform regulations promulgated pursuant to this Act. Such regulations containing such determination shall include, but not be limited to: pottery, basketry, bottles, weapons, weapon projectiles, tools, structures or portions of structures, pit houses, rock paintings, rock carvings, intaglios, graves, human skeletal materials, or any portion or piece of any of the foregoing items. Nonfossilized and fossilized paleontological specimens, or any portion or piece thereof, shall not be considered archaeological resources, under the regulations under this paragraph, unless found in an archaeological context. No item shall be treated as an archaeological resource under regulations under this paragraph unless such item is at least 100 years of age. [Section 3 (a)]

Some artifact collectors have been known to state something along the lines of the following:

“Regardless of the Jimmy Carter Clause, Section 3 of ARPA says I can legally keep any artifacts I find on federal lands or in federal waters as long as they are less than 100 years old.  They can’t touch me as long as the artifacts I collect are that recent.”

Just like in the previous three main posts, ARPA contains no exemption language that turns off the applicability of other federal statutes and regulations to collector activities on federal lands and in federal waters. Federal agencies can still nail artifact collector hides to the wall using the other applicable federal statutes and regulations that deal with trespassing, stealing federal property, etc.  An artifact less than 100 years old that is collected on federal property is still federal property, regardless of ARPA.

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s